The claim volume broke the old model
Product surfaces change monthly and every vendor asserts the same capabilities. Annual, opinion-led coverage cannot track that, and buyers have noticed the dates on the reports they are handed.
OmniAxis is built and operating in production. It opens to registered early customers at the November 2026 MVP launch, and to everyone at general availability in January 2027. This page says where we are, what registration gets you, and the direction of travel afterwards, stated plainly enough to judge and without the detail that would hand a rival the plan.
Every serious technology decision rests on assertions nobody checked, and the people who review decisions have started asking for the file.
A vendor writes what it can do. An analyst publishes a view on a slow cycle. A review site aggregates opinion. A buying committee then makes a seven-figure decision on top of all three, and the one thing missing is the plain question of whether the claims are true. That gap was tolerated because closing it was manual work nobody could afford at scale.
Two things changed. Checking claims against independent evidence, repeatedly and across a whole market, became tractable. And the audience for the decision changed: boards, regulators and auditors now expect an organization to show why a supplier was chosen and what it knew at the time. The organization that holds that record becomes the reference the decision is judged against.
That is the thesis. What follows is where we are against it.
Dates attach to the launch and to general availability, never to a feature. What comes after is described as direction, below.
Every side of the product runs today from one research library: the evaluation portal for buyers, the advisory portal for firms running selections on a client's behalf, and the vendor portal for vendors. Working sessions run under NDA, on the prospect's own shortlist.
Buyer-side organizations register for the MVP. Registration is reviewed, and organizations are invited in order of fit, with U.S. buyer-side teams first.
Register for the November 2026 MVPA registered team brings a shortlist to a working session and sees its own decision take shape as a record: claims held to evidence, open questions recorded, reasoning kept.
The first release, open only to registered early customers. Evaluate a shortlist, keep the evidence and the reasoning, and leave with a record that survives procurement, audit, legal, finance and board review.
The platform opens to any organization, not only the registered early customers invited before it.
Themes rather than a feature list, set out below. Each is a direction already under way; none is a commitment to deliver a named thing on a date.
None was true five years ago. All three are true today.
Product surfaces change monthly and every vendor asserts the same capabilities. Annual, opinion-led coverage cannot track that, and buyers have noticed the dates on the reports they are handed.
Reading the documented record across a market, and keeping that reading current, stopped being a research department and became a running cost. The economics of the work inverted.
Procurement, risk, audit and the board increasingly need a defensible reason for a selection rather than a preference. An answer that carries its evidence is worth more than an answer that carries a logo.
Themes, not a feature list.
The evaluation surface is the one buyers pull hardest on, and the record it produces is the product. Expect the weight of the work to sit there.
Near term
Teams can already work from the assistant they run instead of from another portal. The direction is to put more of the decision there.
Near term
More of each market covered without loosening what counts as evidence. Coverage that costs discipline is not coverage worth having.
Through the year
The approach is not specific to security or IT software. Adjacent markets with the same claim-versus-proof problem are the natural expansion, in the order the demand appears.
Longer horizon
We do not publish the roadmap in feature form, the method by which claims are held to evidence, or the source catalog. A published method is one a vendor can optimize against, which would make the record worthless to the buyer relying on it. A published roadmap is a build plan for whoever is a quarter behind.
This is not evasiveness about whether the thing works. Every result is inspectable inside a customer's own account, down to the evidence and its date. Registered teams see it on their own shortlist in a working session, under NDA.
If a detail on this page would help a competitor more than it helps you, it has been left out deliberately.
Registration for the November 2026 MVP is open now. Until general availability in January 2027 only registered early customers can use it, and a working session on your own shortlist runs under NDA before launch.